Here is an article from Victoria about our upcoming (repeat) STV referendum in May 2009. This is our second chance at proportional representation and hopefully this time we’ll get it. I don’t think Paul Willcocks totally gets how STV is counted but that is ok, the important thing is it is really, really fair and your vote helps elect the MLAs you want elected the most.
To check-out the proposed ridings take a look at BC-Electoral Boundaries Commission website.
~Ariel Lade, foreign correspondent
By Paul Willcocks, Times Colonist
Thursday, August 30, 2007
I’m sticking with my slogan for the campaign to shift B.C. to a new way of electing MLAs: “STV — it couldn’t be any worse than what we’ve got now.”
The Electoral Boundaries Commission didn’t just recommend new riding boundaries when it reported this month. It also set out proposed ridings that would be used under the single-transferable vote proportional representation system.
Wait. Don’t quit reading. This is important, and pretty interesting.
You remember STV. The Citizens’ Commission on Electoral Reform — Premier Gordon Campbell’s very fine creation — recommended a shift to that system. It went to referendum in 2005 and 58 per cent of voters supported the change — just shy of the 60 per cent needed. So Campbell said there would be a repeat referendum along with the provincial election in 2009. This time, proposed ridings would be set out so people could make a more informed decision.
That’s what the commission provided. And all in all, despite some problems, the proposed ridings confirm the STV system would be an improvement. Voters in the capital region, for example, would gain MLAs who would better reflect their preferences and be more attentive to the interests of constituents.
Under the system there would be fewer, larger ridings, with two to six MLAs, depending on the population.
On election day, you wouldn’t just mark an X beside your choice. You would rank as many candidates as you liked, in order of preference. The results reflect voters’ rankings. (The tallying method is explained well at www.gov.bc.ca/referendum_info.)
The system’s benefits include a legislature that better reflects the wishes of voters. It’s likely, for example, that the 162,000 British Columbians who voted Green — 9.2 per cent of the total — would have ended up with members of the party representing them under the STV system.
The ranking system means voters can mix their choices — ranking Liberals first and second, and a Green candidate they admire third, for example. In the proposed Capital Region riding, the 10.4 per cent of voters who wanted a Green representative would have a chance of ensuring that at least one of the six MLAs from the riding would be from the party. And the proposed system would mean members of the same party would have to compete with each other for support.
That’s important. The real contest now in many ridings is the battle for the nomination, not the election itself. And MLAs — especially in government — tend to worry as much about staying on the good side of the party as they do advocating for their ridings. That would change under STV.
There are problems with making the switch. The greatest benefits come when there are four or five MLAs in a riding. But that is impractical in some areas of B.C. To have the population needed to justify even three MLAs, the ridings would have to be enormous.
So there are two ridings proposed in the north - Northeast and Northwest - that would have only two MLAs each. There are several ridings with three MLAs — the Kootenays become one large riding with three representatives.
The benefits of the system are reduced with two-person ridings, and there are some risks. In a riding with four or five seats, it’s likely candidates will emerge who target individual communities within the riding to win support. But in a two-candidate riding, there’s a risk some areas might be ignored. It’s a long way from Tumbler Ridge to Fort Nelson.
Still, tally the pros and cons and the system looks like a major step forward. And the Electoral Boundaries Commission established that across most of the province, it’s possible to set out ridings that make sense and allow three or more MLAs to be elected from a riding.
Here in the capital region, for example, the commission proposes a six-member riding that pretty much conforms to the regional district boundaries. It should offer a great opportunity for voters’ diverse interests and priorities to be reflected in the legislature. They will be able to support the four best Liberals, if they want to see the government stay in power, but perhaps also a New Democrat who understands their local issues and a Green candidate to advance environmental issues. And again, that means every candidate — even ones in the same party — must prove to voters that they will be the best representative. Feisty, independent candidates will be more likely to be rewarded by voters than muzzled by their parties.
The STV system isn’t perfect. But it’s better than what we have now, and it’s the only chance for change.
Footnote: The referendum will be held in May 2009. If the change is approved, it would take effect for the 2013 election. Expect passionate campaigns for and against as the date of the vote comes closer.
pwillcocks@tc.canwest.com
© Times Colonist (Victoria) 2007
TORONTO - Ontario’s voting system works badly and should be reformed by
Jim Harris is the former Leader of the Green Party of Canada and recent inductee to the board of directors for Fair Vote Canada. He believes that there is a historic opportunity to move to a system of Mixed Member Proportional Representation.
Joseph Angolano is completing his Ph’d in Democratic Theory at the London School of Economics and is the creator of the website, www.notommp.ca. He accepted my invitation to come onto GP Radio to communicate his concerns about mixed member proportional representation, ranging from the politics around list creation to just plain confusing the Ontario voter. I spoke to him from his home in Toronto, Ontario on August 23.
Avo, a 6 month old puppy, believes that Mixed Member Proportional Representation will be good because it would allow all breeds of dogs to play together in Parliament.
Scott Piatkowski represents the powerful lobby group of adorable kittens who present the citizens of Ontario with an ultimatum: pass MMP or all kittens in Ontario will lie on your newspaper while you are reading it, refuse to use the litterbox, or simply ignore you.
and a fair number of positive responses - including a donation to the campaign and three requests for lawn signs.